By Alan Thomas, marketing department, ZwickRoell
The right hardness test method depends on the material being tested and the specific requirements of the application. Understanding the differences among the available options helps determine which method will give the best results.
The most common methods used for testing the hardness of metals are Rockwell, Brinell, Vickers and Knoop. Each of these methods employs different indenters and loads to measure the material’s resistance to plastic deformation. A key distinction between Rockwell testers and Brinell, Vickers and Knoop testers is that the latter three use optical technology, while Rockwell does not, which generally makes it less costly, quicker and easier to test, and the surface finish of the specimen is not so critical. This makes it one of the most commonly used method for metals hardness testing. The optical methods involve the use of a camera system, generally consisting of a digital camera, a light source, and lenses with various magnification strengths.
Other factors to consider when it comes to harndess testing include:
Measurement principle
Rockwell testers measure hardness based on the depth of penetration of an indenter into the surface of a material under a known load. Superficial Rockwell is used when the material being tested is relatively thin or has a surface layer that is significantly harder or softer than the bulk material. Brinell, Vickers and Knoop testers measure hardness based on the size and dimensions of the indentation created by a precisely shaped indenter and the load applied.
Indenter geometry
The Rockwell method uses an indenter with either conical or spherical shape. Brinell hardness testing also uses a hard spherical indenter, but as already mentioned, rather than measuring depth, measures the diameter of the indentation. Vickers and Knoop hardness tests use a diamond shaped or pyramidal indenter, where the diagonals of the indentation are measured and the hardness value is calculated based on the applied load.
Material types
Rockwell methods are well suited for a wide range of materials, especially for metals and alloys, and in many cases the key consideration is the shape and surface of the sample to be tested. The information content gained also plays a role. Most often a single measurement is carried out, which provides general hardness information on the material or area being tested. Rockwell is often used for steel, aluminium, any other metals, as well as plastics and ceramics.
The Rockwell method is further categorised into various scales. Commonly used scales are:
Brinell is mostly used for slightly softer metals, but also for large or rough surfaces (when high test forces are used), coarse grained material, and/or high loads up to 3,000kgf. It is commonly applied for tests on materials with a relatively low hardness range, such as non-ferrous metals, castings and softer steels. Materials that fall into a very high hardness scale, or thin and small components, tend to be better suited for Knoop or Vickers testing.
Vickers methods are widely used for microhardness testing, which is essential for measuring the hardness of small or thin materials or for analysing the hardness of specific microstructures in a material. This makes it valuable for examining thin films, coatings, and small features in various industries. Vickers is also often used for series measurements or mappings. This also includes CHD (case hardness depth), SHD (surface hardness depth) and NHD (nitriding hardness depth).
Knoop hardness testing is used primarily when the material being tested is thin, small, or has anisotropic properties. It is especially suitable when measuring the hardness of brittle materials such as ceramics, very thin coatings, and individual microscopic features. It is used on composite materials, where it allows for targeted hardness assessments on individual constituents within the material. Knoop hardness testing is often used in R&D applications for materials characterisation, failure analysis and mechanical property investigations. It provides valuable insights into the microstructural properties and mechanical behaviour of materials.
Load application
The load selection depends on the material being tested, the desired indentation size and the specific requirements of the application. In general, the recommendation is to choose the highest possible load. This minimises the influence of the surface treatment on mounted, cut or ground specimens. Also, with a higher load, the metallographic structure becomes more irrelevant. For specific materials or applications, there may be standard recommendations or specifications that suggest suitable loads. Industry standards or material specific guidelines can provide valuable information on load selection.
Micro versus macro hardness tester
Another common distinction is made between micro and macro hardness testing. Here, a basic differentiator is the application of lower loads and higher loads for different methods.
Micro hardness testing involves applying a lower test load, typically ranging from a few grams to a few kilograms, while macro hardness testers use heavier loads ranging from kilograms to tonnes. Micro hardness testing uses high magnification to accurately measure the dimensions of the small indentation. The test indentation is examined and measured using a microscope or an optical system. In macro hardness testing, the indentation is typically observed and measured without the need for high magnification.
Micro hardness testing is commonly used for examining small or thin samples, coatings, CHD Rows, NHD Rows, SHD Rows, hardness mappings or localised areas of interest. It is widely employed in materials science, metallurgy, and research applications to study microstructures, phase transformations, as well as hardness variations within a material. Macro hardness testing, on the other hand, is suitable for larger samples and provides a more general measurement of hardness for quality control purposes, material selection, or assessing bulk properties.
Will joined Fastener + Fixing Magazine in 2007 and over the last 15 years has experienced every facet of the fastener sector - interviewing key figures within the industry and visiting leading companies and exhibitions around the globe.
Will manages the content strategy across all platforms and is the guardian for the high editorial standards that the Magazine is renowned.
Don't have an account? Sign Up
Signing up to Fastener + Fixing Magazine enables you to manage your account details.